Friday, January 29, 2010

"A Failure of the English Language" or "The Lexicon of Gluttony"

An interesting gap in our native tongue (or at least my native tongue, I have a reader in Sweden YAY!) occurred to me last night:

When you want food you describe your condition as hungry.
As in "Woman fetch me a sandwich, for I am HUNGRY"

When you want a beverage you describe your condition as thirsty.
As in "Woman fetch me a beer, for I am THIRSTY"

But what about when you want to smoke?
As in "Woman pack me a bowl( of perfectly legal pipe tobacco, of course), for I am ________"


I am "naturally aspirated"? I am "well oxygenated"? I am "toxin-free"? A friend suggested that a good word would be "fiending" but that sounds to much like you're chasing the dragon.
As in "Woman fill my hypodermic needle, for I am FIENDING"

I propose the adjective for smoking should be both familiar and unoffensive yet reminiscent of the act which you wish to preform. I propose "LUNGRY".
Woman pack me a bowl, for I am LUNGRY.
Nice.

Let me know what you think.
-T

PS None of the above requests would get me anywhere in my house. The GLW does not respond well to misogynistic demands but it does me good to believe that somewhere (or at least at sometime) a man can get a sandwich/beer/bowl/needle full of opiate with such an archaic display of machismo. Have a great weekend!

Monday, January 25, 2010

"Who Dat Say Dey Gonna Beat Dem Dere Saints" or "You Heard it Here 168th"




You heard it here first, The Saints are going to win their first Super Bowl two weeks from now in Miami. I have absolutely nothing to back that up, nor the energy to craft some long winded justification in picking the 4 point Vegas-Line underdogs.

I Just feel it in my gut and as the GLW made delicious pulled pork sliders for the games yesterday and I may have over indulged, my gut is unusually insistent right now. I'm afraid that ignoring my gut under these circumstances could lead to a messy disaster. I just cant take that risk.

-T

PS. sorry for the lack of posts for the last few days. I am convinced my house is filled with mold spores that are trying to kill me and while my epic battle with these airborne adversaries will make great blog fodder it is also making me sick as hell, hence my creative output is suffering. It is a sad irony that participating in events worthy of exposition deprives one of the energy needed to craft worthwhile prose. Bleh. I need a biographer.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

"I Can Do What I Want, but I Can't Do it Now." or "I am Easily Influenced by the Books I read"


I know this is not a pipe, it is a picture of a pipe, but that doesn't change the following fact:

I want a Pipe.
The obvious response to this statement would be "Well then go get a pipe."
Ah, if only it were that simple. You see the GLW does not want me to get a pipe and abhors any form of tobacco use whatsoever, academically I agree with her but practically...
To preface this I should say that I have been battling a minor smoking habit (read nicotine addiction) for the better part of the last two years. Sometimes successfully sometimes not. The unsuccessful periods due in large part to Nicotine's good friend Alcohol. That is not to say I've only been smoking for the last 2 years, no far from it. I smoked intermittently during the latter years of High School, stepped it up a bit during my time in the Marine Corps and fratastically increased my smoking while at university.
At least while I was smoking in the Marine Corps I had a fairly legit excuse. Don't get me wrong I loved my time in the Corps, but the fact of the matter is that Military life consists primarily of two things: "Hurry up and Wait" (Long periods of inaction punctuated by brief, intense movement) and mundane, but taxing, physical labor. Both are highly conducive to developing a smoking habit, the former in an obvious manner, the latter not so much. In the case of the latter perhaps some explanation is in order. Picture this scenario: you are building a seemingly endless sandbag wall in some unnamed and arid environs. You are exhausted but daren't ask the NCO in charge to go stand under yonder shady tree for five minutes. Your fellow Devil Dog goes up to the Sergeant and asks for a smoke break and low and behold your fearless leader acquiesces. Now what do you do? Do you keep toiling in the sun like a fool? No. You go have a damn Cigarette.

As to my smoking in college: I was drunk all of the time. Enough Said.

I digress, as to my smoking now: The GLW has agreed that I can get a pipe when I'm thirty provided I've packed in the stogies and it's only for occasional use. Enter Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Sherlock Holmes smokes a pipe (and cigarettes and cigars and injects Cocaine, but that's besides the point) and he solves mysteries AND he's a national Hero. I of course feel the deep an inexorable need to emulate my literary man-crush and thus I want a pipe now.

There's something incredibly enchanting, even more so in this blustery weather, about pensively puffing on a pipe while pondering life's great questions. Rolling my thoughts around in my head as I roll the smoke around in my mouth, gazing furtively in to the great beyond and blowing smoke in fate's face. I've waxed poetic enough I think, but to the case at hand my recent reading of The Complete Sherlock Holmes has provoked me to repeatedly drop hints reminding the GLW of her promise to let me buy a pipe (and presumably tobacco) in the coming decade. These comments she's dodged nimbly or blatantly ignored until I cornered her yesterday. To whit her response "You can do whatever you want!" in the blink of an eye several thoughts flashed across her face "You just cant do it Now!"

I'm scared, I don't know exactly what that means, but I'm pretty sure it's a trap. I'm going to apply Mr. Holmes' vaunted method of deductive reasoning to puzzle this one out and get back to you. Until then I may be stuck with post-modern pictures of pipes.

-T




Tuesday, January 19, 2010

"Rain, Rain Go Away" or "DoJ Needs to Hurry the Hell Up With Those Stories"

It is seriously pissing down here in the beautiful Napa Valley (or rather the soggy Napa Valley). The last time it rained as hard with a comparable amount of rain forecast in the near future this happened:
Coupled with the fact that 2009 was a very dry year we may have a serious problem on our hands. If the ground is to dry and compacted it can't absorb enough of the rain and when you live at the bottom of the biggest water shed for miles in any direction that can cause serious problems. We're talking millions and millions of dollars in property damage and crops lost. Not good in a struggling economy.
Still though there is a very dark and evil part of my psyche that would like to be forced to stay home for days on end through no fault of my own. Ha! no I take that back immediately, now if it floods I'll feel guilty and any exercises in blameless sloth would be ruined.

I need to learn to keep my big mouth shut, but seriously one of the problems of living in a veritable paradise is that our local infrastructure is not prepared for any sort of inclimate weather. Case in point: about two months ago we had a stiff breeze and lost power in a good portion of Napa. We may have 355 days of perfect weather but for the other ten we are completely fucked; the river overflows, power lines fall over, trees crash into houses and across major roads and our local government is completely helpless to do anything about it.
I lament the state of the roads or sidewalks at the best of times but in the rain they're a downright liability.
It's the wages of sin I suppose, but I can't help but feel like a place with so much money flowing through it would be a little better equipped to deal with the normal cycles of nature. Don't give me any crap about this being do to with El Nino either, even if it is, that body of warm water IS part of the normal system of nature, it's a regular as fucking clockwork and we're always unprepared to deal with it? Bullshit.
- T
p.s. I don't really want it to flood, I wouldn't want to get my XBOX wet.

p.p.s Sorry for the lame post about the weather, but DoJ is taking his sweet time with those stories and I couldn't think of anything else to rant about.

Monday, January 18, 2010

"Rough Weekend" or "How to Fake a Moral Victory"

The Jets win and Avatar wins a Golden Globe? WTF!?! On top of that it's rainy as shit and I don't get MLK day off. All in all I'd say this is a craptastic start to the week. On the up side however the Saints and Indy both won and let's face it those are the two teams that really deserve to be in the Superbowl anyway. Can you imagine a Jets/ Vikings Superbowl? Would anyone watch? I think not.

Another Tally in the win column comes from Robert Downey Jr. winning best Actor in a comedy. I don't know though, that was kind of a back handed compliment, I mean was Sherlock Holmes a comedy? That's probably why Guy Ritchie didn't show up to the ceremony. The GLW and I did a little Golden Globe pool last night (As recompense for me monopolizing the TV with the Playoffs all weekend) and boy did she kick my ass. Seriously she picked practically every winner. I'm talking "best female understudy in a cinema verite special" boom she'd have it. At first I was taking it as a point of pride, chiding her for reading to much US weekly while I read other fare like, I don't know, books or something. After a while though it got kind of grating, nobody likes to be shut out right? I don't care what the competition is. Then came my saving graces, Mr. Downey and Das weisse bande (the German winner of best foreign film).
As Sherlock Holmes was one of my favorite films of 09 and Das Weisse Bande is in a foreign language, and thus obviously more intellectual, I immediately declared a moral victory and retired to the game room to play Call of Duty 2. You can't say I'm not gracious in my triumphs.
- T
p.s. On a more exciting note my good friend DoJ will be contributing a few tales of his recent drunken exploits in the big city. Wait with bated breath.

Friday, January 15, 2010

Potential -E- Wasted is taking on some contributors!

We are now publishing TeamBlackout Archival stories and rants. With any luck this could become the TB homepage, with yours truly as moderator of course.
-T

"NFL Divisional Playoffs T's Picks" or "How not to Bet"

Chargers vs Jets - Pick: Chargers

As a Raiders fan I am loathe to pick the Chargers to win anything, but to be honest this year they have been fairly innocuous and reasonably fun to watch. Honestly though I am making this choice based on my absolute loathing of the NY Jets. No team has annoyed me as consistently as Rex's rejects and quite frankly a really wish Rex Ryan would just go away. It's really troubling to me that this blubbering Jaba the Hutt is trying to take credit for any of the Jets' success given that he wrote his own team off after their loss to the Falcons. If there is anything that annoys me more than a greasy fat guy it's a greasy fat guy crying. This ass hat has oscillated from bombastic and unintelligible arrogance to whimpering self pity and I have no time for him. He reminds me of nothing so much as a fickle front runner. That an Asshat like Ryan can coach an NFL team much less a team IN THE PLAYOFFS troubles me. I want him to go away and I think the Chargers are the team to do the job.

Indy Vs Baltimore - Pick: Indy

Ray Lewis and the Baltimore D's hypocrisy when it comes to the Brady rule astounds me, so again I am making my pick "Ad Hominem"or Rather "Ad Defensor". Plus say what you will about the Colts Peyton is unstoppable when he's on his game and I don't think the Baltimore DBs can handle Indy's receiving corps. I'm looking for a blowout here.

Minnesota Vs Dallas - Pick: Dallas

I don't think the extra rest is going to help Farve enough to make him effective and AP has fallen off the map. On the other side of the ball Dallas is hot and Miles Austin is totally my breakthrough player of the season. If Choice, Jones and Barber deliver on the running game Dallas has this one in the bag.

New Orleans Vs Arizona - Pick: New Orleans

This is probably the toughest call of the bunch. Both of these teams look good and both have been inconsistent in the latter half of the season. I'm taking N.O. because their inconsistency can be attributed to the fact that they locked down NFC home field advantage early on. Plus I think N.O. at their best beats AZ at their best. You've just got to love the Brees - Colston connection. I'm going to go ahead and ignore the Kardassian Curse (The saints have underperformed or lost every game while Reggie Bush has been with Kim Kardassian) because of the GLW. The GLW has a crush on Mr. Bush so it would be nice for her to have something to cheer for when I make her watch 12+ hours of football this weekend; and I can't see a down side to Reggie being in a relationship.

Feel free to tell me how wrong I am.
-T

"Things to Ponder over the Weekend" or "Blog-Fail"

1. Why do they make most Soda bottles resealable and most beer bottles not?

2. Why can't I think of anything better to write about?

OK so this creative thing is a lot harder than I had forecast. I'll be back later today with some more palatable vitriol.
-T

Thursday, January 14, 2010

"21 is more than 20" or "The Shameless Septuagenarian"

I had to go to my local Raley's yesterday to pick up a few essentials, specifically Sour Cream, Cashews and a replacement propane tank for my grill, and I was met with one of the great frustrations of our age: Old people who don't think the laws of the land apply to them.

I quickly grabbed my items and made a beeline for the express checkout when a kindly old lady swooped in front of me with a FULL CART of items. Chivalry obliged me to let her pass and I so I stood in line silently fuming as the cashier unloaded 21 individually bagged vegetables from this saintly matriarch's collection.

Upon reaching the 21st item I was to hear the cashier remark "You know ma'am this line is for 20 items only" to whit our geriatric grocery enthusiast responded "Oh shoot, I thought I had less..." She then proceeded to ask the clerk the locations of several other items which she couldn't find, guilting (with a sickly sweet smile) the employee into sending assistance to locate and retrieve said items. Admittedly this was so she could go through the checkout again but still I needed the bagger's help with my propane.

Our ancient antagonist then proceeded to pay with (you guessed it) exact CHANGE. Notice I said change and not cash. This crazy old Biddie was counting out nickles and dimes, all the while making adorable chit-chat concerning the weather, her dinner plans, and any amount of other pedantry, ad nauseam.

Bullshit.
1. She knew she had 21 items to begin with; she'd individually bagged them.
2. The express checkout lane is not for small talk. It is expressly labeled express for the express purpose of express.
3. Yes, you can pay with cash in the express lane, but it sort of defeats the damn purpose when you have to separate the dimes from the coughdrops in front of everyone.
4. The shameless gall of this woman in asking for further assistance! I needed the bagger to unlock the propane for me!

Bah! To all the sweet old Grandmothers reading this blog: "LEARN THE RULES!!!"

-T

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Avatar or "The Curious Instance of the Nuke on Pandora"

I will save you all my rehashing of James Cameron's latest masturbatory epic's similarities to Dances With Wolves and Pocahontas (http://failblog.org/2010/01/10/avatar-plot-fail/)

I'm also going to avoid describing, at least in detail, how the visual strength of the film hinges on its' marked resemblance to a 162 minute acid trip.

I'm even going to avoid mocking the slew of escapist theater junkies who have expressed feelings of intense depression and terminal ennui due to the fact that they can't really go to Pandora and get freaky with trees and what not.

I am instead going to pose a few questions.

Why didn't the humans just nuke the mother loving "Tree of Souls" from space?

Why did they feel that sending slow moving, insufficiently armored helicopters into the middle of a floating terrestrial asteroid field within the effective altitude of a myriad of nimble enemy combatants was the right tactical choice?

Why did they need to deposit ground troops into a dense jungle when their target was a single, static enemy structure?

And don't give me any garbage about how the area disrupted their guidance systems. They knew the location of the damn tree and they could've carpet bombed the whole canyon or hit it with a effing cruise missile (we have those NOW for Pete's sake!). Bullshit, total bullshit.

Yes the purpose of a movie, if you're a cynical jerk, is to sell tickets and yes, in that regard the movie has overwhelmingly succeeded, but come on!
Don't ask me to root against my species Mr. Cameron and if you do please have a better argument than "on this planet the hippie mysticism is justified because it's scientific, see we have scientists and they do science" And don't think I didn't catch that dig that we humans have killed our "earth mother" as if by developing the wherewithal to discredit a unifying mystical pantheism we have some how destroyed it. (Wow, my rant is getting a little off topic but whatever)
Give me a break, sentimental sappy douchebaggery in 3D is still sentimental sappy douchebaggery and thus I feel the need to call shenanigans.

If I ever go to Pandora, I will be sure to wear some flowers in my hair but until then SHENANIGANS. That is all.
- T

P.s. You know I totally looked up Avatar porn the moment I came back from the theater (much to the chagrin of the GLW).

Woo Hoo. I'm a Blogger.

... and so it begins.

Hello Blogosphere, my name is T and I will be shouting into an empty room for the remainder of our relationship.

As to my identity I am a married twenty-something living and working in the wine industry in Napa Valley ... wait... Please don't go.

Wait...

Hold on....

Don't leave me...
OK to clarify I WILL NOT be writing about wine, giving tasting notes, or exuding any form of pretentious, gloating douchebaggery. OK. So, the last point might not be entirely true, but when I am gloating and pretentious I promise it will have nothing to do with wine, the industry and people maybe, but definitely not the beverage.

As far as the title of my blog goes it refers to both the wasting of any of my minor compositional potential on an electronic forum (get it? "E"?) and to the good chance that I may be drunk while composing a fair percentage of my future posts. I thought it was pretty clever. Well fantastic, my first post and I'm already a gloating douche-bag who explains and kills his jokes while underestimating his non-existent readership.

Nice to meet you and stay tuned.
- T